| Sponsored Ads |  Let NEW NOVELIST SOFTWARE help you complete a novel. NewNovelist software breaks down the process of writing a novel into manageable chunks. NewNovelist provides you with templates on which you stretch and form your characters and scenes ...
|  Blogging to the Bank 2.0 - Learn how one dumb little blog can earn over $3,947 per month!
| |
|
The idea that pictures in commercial communication operate as writing is consistent with the world record, no matter how counterintuitive the notion may first seem, write Linda M. Scott (Oxford University) and Patrick Vargas (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign). Speaking candidly, we would like to see the treatment of pictures as sensory data atrophy in the literaturethe treatment of images as meaningful cultural material has, in our opinion, already shown enough robustness in the rhetorical stream and other studies mentioned above that the older viewpoint is no longer tenable.
In the experiments, different renditions of the same three image types (a cat, a sunset, and an abstract painting) were consistently read by consumers as texts that communicated a complex set of attributes for a facial tissue. Just by varying the style and context of the objects pictured, the authors were able to selectively communicate particular properties that went beyond resemblance to an object or the sensory effects of formal features.
Even in the case of the study with abstract paintings, in which participants were asked to read information from lines, shapes, and colorsbut no discernible objectsclear messages were conveyed. The authors suggest that these findings have significant implications for studies of cognition, culture, and branding, particularly in a global environment where indigenous writing systems vary widely and the postindustrial pictography of the worldwide economy is spreading rapidly.
Linda M. Scott and Patrick Vargas. Toward a Unifying Theory of Consumer Response to Images Journal of Consumer Research: October 2007.